About Louis

In this site, I will give a summary of the discoveries to date and the new one also. My family helps me a lot: Benoît is discussing the findings; my wife Madeleine, a nurse is helping also. My daughter Rosanne devised this WEB site and her husband Jamie is a proficient programmer who can help me a lot, even with his big family of 7 nice kids. I am now retired after 52 years of teaching mostly physics and maths. Bonjour Je suis un professeur de sciences depuis plus de 50 ans. J’ai enseigné de la 7e année à la 12e puis à l’université d’Ottawa et enfin au collèege. J’enseigne depuis plus de 25 ans au collège Boréal, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Depuis le début, je désirais comprendre la gravité. Après beaucoup d’essai infructueux, j’ai découvert qu’un rayon de lumière peut bloquer la force de gravité. Encore beaucoup de recherche permettront de comprendre la nature de la gravité. Mon grand gars Benoît ia fait un baccalauréat en Sciences infirmières . Il m’a beaucoup encouragé dans ma recherche. Mon épouse Madeleine est infirmière et ma grande fille Rosanne a réussi à faire ce site WEB malgré le travail avec ses 7 beaux enfants. Mon gendre Jamie Parent est programmeur et très habile avec les ordinateurs. Louis Joseph Rancourt

générateur utilisant la gravité

générateur utilisant la gravité

Un laser connecté sur une source externe et qui est assez puissant envoie de la lumière dans les bobines de fibre optique en verre. La lumière de la dernière bobine est redirigée vers la première bobine par une connexion en y.

À cause de la position horizontale des bobines dont l’axe centrale est un peu décalé par rapport à l’axe des volants, une moitié de chaque volant est poussée vers la bobine. Cela fait tourner la roue. La roue au centre tourne dans le sens opposée des 4 roues externes. En connectant chacun de ces volants à un générateur électrique, on peut envoyer les courants produits en parallèle, dans la même direction.

Quand la puissance électrique produite est plus grande que la puissance requise par le laser, un dispositif électronique déconnecte le laser de la puissance externe et permet d’utiliser le surplus d’électricité produite, 24 heures sur 24.
Avec cet arrangement de 5 volants, aucune perte de l’effet de la lumière sur la gravité n’est causée. L’effet se rapproche de 100% de gain.

 

Cet effet est produit car une partie de la gravité arrivant horizontalement vers les volants est déviée par la lumière allant dans les bobines. Ce déséquilibre est assez fort pour tourner les volants.

generateur 2

 

Gravity is a pushing force.

Gravity is a pushing force.

The clear results of an experiment can only be explained with the concept that gravity is a pushing force and not an attractive force.

Newton’s formula stating that the force of gravity between two objects depends on the mass of the objects and inversely with the distance between the objects. It does not say if it is a pushing or an attractive force. Many scientists thought that it was an attractive force and the public thinks the same. Here is a proof that it is not an attractive force.

An object is placed in the middle of an horizontal lever. One end of the lever is placed on the platen of an analytical balance and the other end is on a table.

g1

If the force of gravity was an attraction coming from the planet earth and pulling down the test mass on the lever, then the balance would indicate a certain weight. This force is indicated by the blue arrow in the next drawing.

g2

A powerful light ray was sent horizontally over the test mass as indicated on the next drawing. There should be no effect on the force acting on the mass if the force is coming from the planet as indicated by the blue arrow because the light is over the test mass. The result is surprising: the test mass has less weight when the light ray passes over the mass.

g3

Some might argue that since light has energy according to the formula stating that energy and mass are interchangeable ( Energy = mass x c x c ) where c is the speed of light, then some will say that the mass equivalent of the light over the test mass is also producing a force upwards on the test mass. That would explain why the weight is smaller because there is a force attracting upwards. If we calculate the equivalent mass of the light ray used in the experiment, that mass would be smaller that one atom of oxygen or nitrogen. Air all around the test mass is made of oxygen and nitrogen and one atom more or less does is not able to make the change of weight observed.

What caused the loss of weight then.

The next experiment gave a hint of that cause.

The same light source was used to direct the light beam under the test mass.

g4

Since the mass equivalent of the light beam is very small, it has no effect on pushing the test mass downward. But the weight of the mass increases when the light beam passes under the mass. Where is that force directed downard originates? The mass of the planet and of the test mass has not changed. The distance has not changed neither. According to the formula (FORCE = G X MASS X MASS / DISTANCE SQUARED,) the weight is not supposed to change but it does.

The most logical explanation is that the force of gravity is coming from all region of space around us. The amount coming from under is less because the planet did block some of that force.

The difference is directed down because the total forces coming from space is now greater than the force that passes through earth. We are pushed down by these forces.

Another interesting conclusion is that the ray of light was able to divert some of that gravity and when the ray passes under the test mass, it diverts some of the force coming from under. That causes a difference in the downward force and the weight of the object increases.

The results of these experiment have been tested many times and an independent researcher in Prague, Libor Newman,  found the same results a few years later without knowing that these results have already been published under Further Experiments Demonstrating the Effect of Light on Gravitation, Applied Physics Research; Vol. 7, No. 4; 2015.

 

interacion du dernier sub quanta avec un proton

Interaction du dernier sub quanta avec un proton ou un électron.

 

Si le dernier sub quanta est réellement l’ultime entité qui forme la matière, voici quel effet il a quand il interagit avec un système complexe comme le proton ou l’électron.

Nous considérons l’électron ou le proton comme les seuls systèmes stables dans l’univers. Ils peuvent être défaits seulement en interagissant avec leur contraire:  électron + positron ou proton + antiproton. Ils redeviennent des non-systèmes alors. Ils sont refait comme systèmes quand une lumière intense de haute fréquence interagit à travers un groupe d’atomes lourds. Pour  l’électron, on a besoin d’une lumière de 1.022 MeV qui correspond à une fréquence de 1.8×10 21 hertz.

 

Quand ils sont des systèmes complexes stables, ils émettent en moyenne autant qu’ils reçoivent de toutes les directions. Si on pouvait calculer le vecteur total des émissions et des réception et que ces 2 vecteurs étaient exactement zéro, alors le système conserve la même vélocité qu’avant. Ceci est tellement rare qu’il ne se produit presque jamais. En tant normal, les émissions et les réceptions causent un changement de vélocité et c’est ce qui explique le système atome et toutes les interactions de la matière dans l’univers matériel.

 

Si un seul dernier sub quanta interagit avec un système, cela cause un changement de la vélocité du système. Ce changement est rapidement changé quand un autre dernier sub quanta interagit avec ce système. Pour avoir un changement constant de vélocité, il faut que les réceptions soient plus dense venant d’une certaine direction. C’est le cas des objets sur terre qui reçoivent plus de gravité venant de l’espace que le montant de gravité qui traverse la terre. Donc la vélocité de l’objet est dirigé vers le sol. Nous nommons cet effet la pesanteur et la mesure est d’environ 9.8 Newton par kilogramme qui donne une accélération de 9.8 mètre par seconde carrée.

 

 

neutron star and space gravity

neutron star and space gravity

A neutron star has a gravitational force of about 2×1012 N/kg.

Since its density is so great, the stars blocks all gravity coming from space and that gravity does not go through the star. It becomes part of the neutrons. That means the gravity going in all direction in space can exert a force of  about 2×1012 N/kg. Since earth blocks some of that gravity and the result is only about 10 N/kg, that means planet earth blocks only about 5×10-12 % of gravity coming from space.

Because neutron stars called also black holes blocks gravity, an object close to the star is pushed toward the star with a force of 2×1012 N/kg. It seems for an observer that the star is attracting the object but in reality, the object is pushed toward the star because it receives a force from only one direction, as illustrated here.

Gravity coming from all directions of space towards earth

neutgron 1      Near a neutron star

n2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Galaxy rotation anomaly

 

Galaxy rotation anomaly

 

Text from wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curve

If Newtonian mechanics is assumed to be correct, it would follow that most of the mass of the galaxy had to be in the galactic bulge near the center and that the stars and gas in the disk portion should orbit the center at decreasing velocities with radial distance from the galactic center (the dashed line in Fig. 1).

Observations of the rotation curve of spirals, however, do not bear this out. Rather, the curves do not decrease in the expected inverse square root relationship but are “flat”, i.e. outside of the central bulge the speed is nearly a constant (the solid line in Fig. 1). It is also observed that galaxies with a uniform distribution of luminous matter have a rotation curve that rises from the center to the edge, and most low-surface-brightness galaxies (LSB galaxies) have the same anomalous rotation curve.

The rotation curves might be explained by hypothesizing the existence of a substantial amount of matter permeating the galaxy that is not emitting light in the mass-to-light ratio of the central bulge. The material responsible for the extra mass was dubbed “dark matter”, the existence of which was first posited in the 1930s by Jan Oort in his measurements of the Oort constants and Fritz Zwicky in his studies of the masses of galaxy clusters. The existence of non-baryonic cold dark matter (CDM) is today a major feature of the Lambda-CDM model that describes the cosmology of the universe.

  https://www.google.ca/search?q=elliptical+galaxy+speed+problems&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjT-JGktLDbAhXn7oMKHTiMDdQQ_AUICigB&biw=808&bih=606

galaxie 2a

 Rotation curve of spiral galaxy M 33 (yellow and blue points with error bars), and a predicted one from distribution of the visible matter (white line). The discrepancy between the two curves can be accounted for by adding a dark matter halo surrounding the galaxy. 

 galaxie 1a

A simulated galaxy without dark matter. Right: Galaxy with a flat rotation curve that would be expected under the presence of dark matter.

 Comparison of rotating disc galaxies in the distant Universe and the present day

 ————————————————————————————

There is  another possibility to explain the difference in velocity observed in these galaxies. Many experimental results on the effect of light on the weight of objects suggest that all matter emit gravity in all directions. Some of that gravity is absorbed by atoms and changed the velocity of these atoms. That seems to be a pushing force caused by gravity.

galaxy c

The galaxy shown on the right is surrounded by millions of other galaxies as seen in the picture on the left. Each atom of these galaxies also emit gravity. That gravity reaching the galaxy in the middle of the picture will exert a pushing force on all its atoms. But some of that gravity is blocked partially going through the galaxy. That causes an imbalance mostly on stars on the outside of the galaxy. They receive more gravity from the exterior that from the interior. The total forces looks like there was a kind of attraction coming from the center. That was the origin of the concept of black matter in the center of the galaxy.

At first observation, it seems that it would receive more gravity coming from the interior because it contains more atoms, but that is not so. The reason is because that galaxy is like a flat pancake, the gravity going toward one star at the edge is more intense in the same plane as of the galaxy itself. But the stars on the perimeter receives gravity not only in the same plane as the galaxy but also from all directions of space. The total amount when all the vector forces are added causes a bigger pushing force in the plane of the galaxy oriented toward the center of the galaxy. The next diagram explains that force.galaxy a

Gravity emitted by the galaxy is going in all directions and there is more in the same plane as the galaxy.

 The star in the red circle seems to receive more gravity in the same plane as the galaxy. But it also receives gravity from all directions as shown in the drawing at the left. The total vector forces is now directed toward the center of the galaxy as shown in the drawing at the right. That is the reason the velocity of that star does follow the inverse square root formula. We do not need any special black matter to explain this behaviour.

galaxy b